rand paul whistleblower question

“My question’s about two people who were friends who worked together at the National Security Council who have been overheard talking about impeaching the president years in advance. US Marshals rescue nearly 40 children in Georgia as part of 2-week operation Kenosha police union gives its version of Blake shootingDid Trump put a dent in negative approval ratings at RNC? "The presiding officer declines to read the question as submitted," the Chief Justice said. Lawmakers in both parties have historically backed those protections.The Associated Press typically does not reveal the identity of whistleblowers.Turn on desktop notifications for breaking stories about interest?

Taking to Twitter afterwards, Paul revealed that he planned on asking whether Obama-era and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings. WASHINGTON -- Chief Justice John Roberts has declined to read an impeachment trial question by Republican Sen. Rand Paul about the intelligence community whistleblower whose complaint led to the investigation into President Donald Trump. “The presiding officer declines to read the question as submitted,” Roberts said of Paul’s question, which also included the name of a Schiff staffer.

: ANALYSISSen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., calls on a reporter during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 30, 2020, during the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. Rather, his decision was a personal one.

Adam Schiff doesn’t know who the whistleblower is.

Washington (CNN) Chief Justice John Roberts on Thursday publicly refused to read a question from Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky during the Senate …

(R-Ky.) on Thursday will try to force Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to read out loud a question regarding the anonymous whistleblower at the center of the impeachment inquiry. My question’s not about the whistleblower,” Paul said.

whistleblower laws exist to protect the identity and careers of people who bring forward accusations of wrongdoing by government officials.

As Senators gathered for the last day of questioning in President Trump’s impeachment trial, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul found his question censored in a way that may have revealed the identity of the mysterious whistleblower.

Dems clamor for Bolton impeachment testimony as manuscript claims Trump-Ukraine quid-pro-quo Roberts declines to read Paul question on whistleblowerFormer pool attendant details alleged relationship with Becki and Jerry Falwell Jr. Subscribe to RT newsletter to get stories the mainstream media won’t tell you The chief justice did not say what was in the note.Earlier, Roberts' staff communicated to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s staff that Roberts did not want to read the whistleblower's name, according to a Republican familiar with the situation who wasn't authorized to speak on the record.Paul said on Twitter after Roberts declined to read his note that the question involved “whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the President before there were formal House Paul left the Senate impeachment proceeding to hold a news conference on the topic. WASHINGTON ― Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Thursday attempted to ask a question during the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, but he was rebuffed by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, the presiding officer. All rights reserved. With the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump nearing its final stages, senators gathered on Capitol Hill on Thursday to question the Democratic prosecution team, and Trump’s defense attorneys.

He claimed his question was not aimed at outing the whistleblower.“I don’t know who the whistleblower is.

Contrary to Schiff, the whistleblower does not enjoy a Senators will likely vote on Friday on whether to allow testimony from additional witnesses, beyond those heard during the inquiry led by House Democrats.