The Stronger

As we have seen from the discussions above, the findings from SFIA are rather complex, and need to be carefully interpreted.In summary, the five waves of the SFIA study found that families in CfC sites appeared to benefit from CfC in a number of different areas, particularly in relation to parenting behaviours. $5.00 $10.00 $20.00 $50.00.

At all other waves, for this lower income group, rates of joblessness in CfC and comparison sites were very similar.Rates of joblessness were higher among families where the primary carer had a lower level of education (Year 10 or lower).

This was the explicit aim of the Communities and Families Clearinghouse Australia, which operated at the Australian Institute of Family Studies from 2008 to 2011, particularly through the publication of "The findings in this report should be viewed in the light of the findings of the earlier evaluation of CfC (Muir et al., 2009). Of the 15 outcomes that were investigated, there were two positive outcomes across all those living in SSLP areas compared to non-SSLPs. In addition, primary carers in CfC sites averaged significantly lower hostile parenting scores at Waves 3 and 5, with the difference around 15% of a standard deviation in both cases. Once their children are old enough to attend child-care, many of these primary carers return to work. Again, these patterns were apparent in both comparison and CfC sites.Average neighbourhood safety scores among families in the top 80% of the income distribution were very similar across waves between comparison and CfC sites and followed a profile over the waves largely underscoring the overall pattern reported in There was a decrease in perceptions of neighbourhood safety in lower income households in both comparison and CfC sites.

The same pattern of results was also observed in the Sure Start initiative (NESS, 2012), where there was a reduction in the rate of joblessness for Sure Start sites compared to comparison sites when children were aged 9 months to 5 years. Ancient/Medieval general discussion General discussion regarding the TtS! Given the early state of implementation and the smaller sample size, we did not report subgroup analyses for the lower and higher income and education subgroups.This chapter provides an overview of some of the early results from this study. Ancient/Medieval rules system. Two years later, this increased to 47%. A similar pattern of results was evident for the lower educated group on primary-carer-reported physical health, with pre-existing lower rates of physical health at baseline in comparison groups driving a negative difference-in-difference finding for CfC sites, even though the proportions in good health were almost identical at Waves 3 and 5.While all families in the intervention group actually resided in CfC sites at Wave 1 of the survey, some may have moved out of a CfC site in subsequent waves. A sole exception for SDQ problem scores relates to children aged 3-5 years in CfC sites, who had significantly higher SDQ problem scores than their counterparts in families that were not jobless at either wave. The improvement corresponds to a period when the target child was entering school, which would have provided all primary carers with more free time to engage in the workplace and may explain the similar reduction in jobless households for contrast sites at this later wave.

Notes: Statistical significance is derived from difference-in-difference models and corresponds to numbers within each row. Nevertheless these findings have significant implications for policy and do provide some important indications for policy initiatives to support vulnerable children and families.This section will discuss the implications of the findings from the first five waves of the SFIA study for policy and practice in relation to early intervention in vulnerable families and communities.

100 competitors test their skills against physically and mentally demanding four-stage obstacle course. In this report, these sites are referred to as Stage 2 CfC sites.

We first provide a descriptive overview of outcomes at baseline (Wave 1) and then provide a further description of patterns of change across Waves 3, 4 and 5.

The regression results also suggest that there is a more consistent association between early reading and later school achievement in CfC compared to comparison sites for all of the outcomes examined.There are a few studies that have examined the effects of parental job loss on children's educational outcomes. Those who required additional assistance at this age could have developmental problems of one kind or another. The same pattern of results was also observed in Sure Start.

As part of the pilot study, the Social Research Centre mailed out to all potential respondents a pre-approach letter introducing the study and encouraging participation. By 8-10 years of age, most children would be expected to be reading independently; for example, in LSAC only 11% of 8-9 year old children often read with their primary carers. The difference was 0.22 of a standard deviation, which is a small effect size. These include:Another potential explanation for the effects observed was that in Phase 1 of the evaluation the CfC initiative was funded to focus on 0-5 year olds. The difference-in-difference estimates for reading suggest a positive program effect overall at Waves 3 and 5, though the subgroup analyses suggest that the gains were concentrated among children living in families that were more advantaged (particularly higher income families).