the ballot or the bullet audience

Like you said it really shows how committed he is to bettering the country. He looks around and sees demonstrations of civil disobedience, and doesn’t believe that this will be enough to win the freedom of his people. As Malcolm X puts it, “You’re in a position to determine who will go to the White House, and who will stay in the doghouse.” The purpose of this argument is to assert that black Americans have so much power as a whole that they can control the entire nation. The year is 1964, the height of the American civil rights movement. In fact, I think we'd be fooling ourselves if we had an audience this large and didn't realize that there were some enemies present. He openly admits that he is a Muslim and that he knows how this could cause some trouble with other members of the civil rights movement who do not share his religious views. Using the same logical progression, Malcolm X goes on to argue that having a “sit-down philosophy” leads to “sit-down action.” This is a reference to the more peaceful methods of civil disobedience and the sit-ins that were occurring at the time. He again makes the audience feel trapped, eliciting feelings of anger and fear, but he also ties this feeling of entrapment to painful historical memories.

This repetition causes the audience to feel enraged and almost trapped because they cannot escape the word control, let alone the control of The Man. His audience has been oppressed for centuries, and he believes that it is time to end this oppression. His implicit major premise is that the candidate with the most votes wins the election, so he draws the conclusion that whichever side the black vote decides to go with wins the election, so long as they vote together. In fact, I think we’d be fooling ourselves if we had an audience this large and didn’t realize that there were some enemies present. After he puts forth the argument about setting up black-owned stores in black communities, he talks about large companies that started out from nothing. However, I think you could expand some more on the ethos that are present. He uses logos to prove that black Americans have been taken advantage of by The Man and propose a solution, he uses ethos to establish his character and credibility so that his audience will be more likely to listen to his solution, and he uses overwhelming pathos that incite the audience to act on his solution.

In order to convince his audience of their power and that they have been made fools of by a white-run government, Malcolm X relies heavily on the three rhetorical proofs. Ok, so heres the rough draft of my paper. They were searching for a solution, and “The Ballot or the Bullet” was their answer. Audience Malcolm X’s empirical audience for “The Ballot or the Bullet” speech was largely, if not solely, African American.

For cutting down on the length of your essay, it may be a tough task because all of your analysis is strong. Also, you could find the points are the weakest and somehow lessen the focus on those by shortening them. In order to show that he is completely invested in this cause, one of the first things Malcolm X does is talk about his religion.

But in the spring of 1964, when Malcolm X gave his "Ballot or the Bullet" speech, he was regarded by a majority of white Americans as a menacing character. Malcolm X delivered the speech “The Ballot or the Bullet” at the Cory Methodist Church in Cleveland, Ohio on 3rd of April, 1963 in front of an estimated crowd of 3,000 people.The audience was formed by both African Americans and white Americans, both of which the speaker targets in his speech. Anything can sit.” Again, the conclusion is implicit.

But before we get into it, since this is the year of the ballot or the bullet, I …

Right now it’s 6 pages plus a little extra, so any suggestions about how to cut that down would be much appreciated…I still have some other ideas I’d like to add in. When he speaks of revolution, he gives examples of bloody revolutions (Russian, Chinese, French, Cuban, and American) in order to show how revolution cannot be accomplished with passive resistance. Within the interpersonal dimension of situated ethos, Malcolm X has so much power as one of the leaders of the civil rights movement. He argues that changing your philosophy to black nationalism allows you to take action, and he uses a very logical thought process to make this claim: “Once you change your philosophy, you change your thought pattern.